Skip to content

Digital versus static Tube advertising

When the flexibility of digital earns its premium, and when paper still wins.

Category
Formats
Written by
The planning team
Reviewed by
Head of planning
Last reviewed
Reading time
6 minute read
A large landscape digital screen carrying a Thomson Reuters advertisement, mounted above a bank of Underground escalators.
Digital versus static Tube advertising

Digital costs more per site than paper. Whether that premium is worth paying comes down to four questions, and for a good number of campaigns the honest answer is no.

The four questions

  1. Do you need more than one execution? Digital carries several in one booking; paper carries one.
  2. Does the message change by time of day? Day-parting is the clearest thing the premium buys.
  3. Is the lead time short? Digital books later than paper, because there is nothing to print and post.
  4. Might the copy change mid-flight? Only digital can.

What paper still does better

Scale, mostly. The largest sites on the network are paper — 48-sheets and 96-sheets on platform and escalator hall walls. Paper is also always on: a digital site shares its loop with other advertisers, so a share of the dwell time in front of the screen is not yours.

What digital does better

Motion, flexibility and timing. Sequential escalator screens can play one story down the shaft in a way paper approximates but does not match, and a campaign that needs to respond to something — weather, a result, a launch date moving — has no paper equivalent.

London Underground advertising formats compared by type, creative size, dwell time and indicative cost
FormatTypeCreative sizeDwellIndicative cost
Digital escalator panelsTypedigitalCreative size1200 x 675 pxDwell45 to 90 secondsIndicative cost£25,000 per station run, per 2 weeks
Digital gatewaysTypedigitalCreative size1080 x 1920 pxDwell10 to 20 secondsIndicative cost£12,000 to £40,000 per 2 weeks
Digital 6-sheet (D6)TypedigitalCreative size1080 x 1920 px, 5 second slotDwell30 to 60 secondsIndicative cost£1,500 per screen, per 2 weeks
Digital 12-sheet (D12)TypedigitalCreative size1920 x 1080 pxDwell30 to 60 secondsIndicative cost£3,000 per screen, per 2 weeks
Digital 48-sheet (D48)TypedigitalCreative sizeSpecification supplied at bookingDwellThe full platform waitIndicative cost£2,000 per panel, per 2 weeks
Digital ribbonTypedigitalCreative sizeSpecification supplied at bookingDwell45 to 90 secondsIndicative cost£35,000 per run, per 2 weeks
Tube car panelsTypestaticCreative size580 x 200 mmDwell21 minute average dwellIndicative cost£18 per panel, per 2 weeks
16-sheet cross-trackTypestaticCreative size2032 x 3048 mmDwell2 minutes 14 secondsIndicative cost£2,250 per panel, per 2 weeks
48-sheet postersTypestaticCreative size3048 x 6096 mmDwell2 minutes 14 secondsIndicative cost£6,000 per panel, per 2 weeks
12-sheet postersTypestaticCreative sizeSpecification supplied at bookingDwell2 minutes 14 secondsIndicative cost£2,000 per panel, per 2 weeks
96-sheet postersTypestaticCreative size3048 x 12192 mmDwell2 minutes 14 secondsIndicative cost£1,800 to £3,200 per panel, per 2 weeks
6-sheet posters (paper)TypestaticCreative size1200 x 1800 mmDwell20 to 40 secondsIndicative cost£1,750 per panel, per 2 weeks
4-sheet postersTypestaticCreative size1016 x 1524 mmDwell20 to 40 secondsIndicative cost£750 per panel, per 2 weeks
Escalator panels (static)TypestaticCreative size1016 x 1524 mmDwell45 to 90 secondsIndicative cost£300 per panel, per 2 weeks
Station dominationTypepackageCreative sizeBespoke packDwellThe whole journey through the stationIndicative cost£40,000 to £250,000 per station, per 2 weeks

Sources and references

  • Media owner rate cardsEvery price on this site is indicative planning guidance pending verification against current rate cards.

Your next campaign could be under London.

Tell us the brief. We come back with sites, costs and on-air dates within two working days.

Get campaign costs